Back

@richlitt Co-sign.

When our community's past leaders-by-consensus fail to act with integrity, it damages the FOSS movement's reputation to those "on the outside".

Fortunately, as you say, our ideals and vision are bigger than any leader or organization; they can and will endure.

But at what reputational cost?

@downey Bugger the outside, this damages the reputation of the OSI even to those in the FOSS movement. And that includes corporate OSS! I say this as someone who is blessed enough to have an affiliate seat.

Our ideals and vision are always bigger than reality, and it's always difficult to work in the open and in any arena.

But surely, I mean, surely the OSI can do better than this.

@downey This is my first time learning about the gag rule for talking about the OSI work.

"[Directors can expect each other] to Disagree during Board deliberation but support publicly all Board decisions, especially those that do not have unanimous consent."

This is horrible. This makes me wonder about so many conversations I have had with board directors over the years, and it also explains a good deal of silence I have gotten to some questions.

You need to allow dissent in the open.

I get that board directors have a responsibility to the organization. I've served on nonprofit boards. I know what that means.

It does not mean you need to publicly agree with all of a board's decisions.

Again, this is bonkers. It's 3:00am where I am and I'm just kind of sitting here gazing into the middle distance, wondering whether I need to start a new nonprofit just to allow big tent open source to have a voice that says: "You matter, your rights as an author of FOSS matter."

@downey "A dissent in a court of last resort is an appeal to the brooding spirit of the law, to the intelligence of a future day, when a later decision may possibly correct the error into which the dissenting judge believes the court to have been betrayed." - Charles E Hughes, Chief Justice.