Recent searches
Search options
Administered by:
@downey@floss.socialLots of understandable concern today as #Microsoft #GitHub announced their new #Copilot availability today. Probably worth a reminder that @conservancy@mastodon.technology has convened a working group on #ethics, #licensing, and other related issues, especially for #FreeSoftware and #OpenSource contributors.
Perhaps you or others may want to join or read more?
Boosts welcome! :boost_requested:
https://sfconservancy.org/news/2022/feb/23/committee-ai-assisted-software-github-copilot/
Software Freedom ConservancyNew Committee Will Investigate Copyleft Implications of AI-Assisted ProgrammingSoftware Freedom Conservancy announces a Committee On AI-Assisted Programming and Copyleft to develop recommendations and plans for a Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) community response to the use of machine learning tools for code generation and authorship. The ethics and morality of machine learning models, which are
regularly being applied to many problems, are a serious concern to policy makers. This Committee will focus on the specific issue of AI-assisted programming using models trained with FOSS, such as we've seen with GitHub's Copilot product.
Microsoft, through their GitHub subsidiary, argues, without evidence, that use of Copilot (which has been trained with a large body of FOSS) is “fair use” of that FOSS, and that all output of Copilot is solely copyrighted by its users. This conclusion focuses on the legal details of issues rather than ethics and morality, and Microsoft and GitHub have refused to provide backing evidence. This Committee will focus on the ethics and morality
of their position, and consider the proper policy positions for the FOSS community and copyleft activists in the advent of AI-assisted programming.
@downey @conservancy@mastodon.technology I'm honestly more concerned that it's extremely anti-competitive. They're the only ones who have unlimited access to all of their repos and the resources to develop an actual model.