Interesting to see #OSI manufacture a problem about people reaching out to others, saying they should rather do this "on our forums where we provide community management and moderation support" https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1014603/c791efdd5a4ca47c/
Last I checked (during the #OSAID snafu Sep/Oct 2024), the OSI forums were so tightly moderated that no sane and open discussion could take place anymore. The crackdown was very effective in letting reform-minded community members know their contributions weren't welcome
1/2
I will add that it was done in a cleverly ambiguous manner, with ample public references to behaviour that made unspecified others feel "unsafe" and pointers to "community guidelines" — while behind the scenes, threads were closed and good faith critical contributions remained unaccountably stuck in moderation queues, with the "system" account simply failing to respond to requests for clarification
They rehearsed how to minimize visible dissent, and surely use the same tactics now
2/2
@dingemansemark Done as recently as a couple days ago:
https://discuss.opensource.org/t/poll-was-your-vote-in-the-2025-board-election-thrown-away/943/7
@downey @dingemansemark Still no reply to this one .. https://discuss.opensource.org/t/results-of-election/927 @ed Why the secrecy?