Recent searches
Search options
Administered by:
@lxo what's the false conclusion? You criticised someone who was calling out someone else's transphobia.
@lxo To be clear about this: I'm referring to https://gnusocial.jp/notice/8003926 in which you say accuse Rysiek of "unrelentingly trying to staple some contradiction onto radek. ISTM you're projecting prejudice." The discussion you're responding to is largely triggered by Radek's claim in https://101010.pl/@rcz/113560689396703899 that "If the test shows Amal is a XY person with 5-alpha-reductase deficiency, that would mean Amal is male". Radek's assertion is unambiguously transphobic, but you criticised Rysiek's response.
@http_error_418 @quasi @mjg59 @lukeshu @dalias @alcinnz I don't recall seeing any post that as much as suggested radek to be transphobe at the point I first intervened. all I saw was a discussion on sports categories and fairness, in which rysiek kept on dragging the conversation to bathrooms, and that didn't sound like the rysiek I've grown fond of.
it looks like I missed a relevant part of the conversation that changes a lot
it looks like you, matthew, intervened by leaping to conclusions that (i) I had seen that part of the conversation (remember we're in the fediverse, conversations aren't distributed equally and entirely, one can see posts that others don't, and one can see only parts of large threads), and (ii) I agreed or supported transphobic views I was not even aware of. none of that holds, and it was entirely uncalled for. bringing the fsf into your misguided rant was an extra layer of prejudice, harm and irresponsibility
it looks like I missed a relevant part of the conversation that changes a lot
it looks like you, matthew, intervened by leaping to conclusions that (i) I had seen that part of the conversation (remember we're in the fediverse, conversations aren't distributed equally and entirely, one can see posts that others don't, and one can see only parts of large threads), and (ii) I agreed or supported transphobic views I was not even aware of. none of that holds, and it was entirely uncalled for. bringing the fsf into your misguided rant was an extra layer of prejudice, harm and irresponsibility
apparently the "reply to all" button mentions even people who merely liked a hateful and misinformed post in the thread
@lxo
I assume the post you are referring to is the original post of this thread by mjg59, because I see on the gnusocial web client that both I and @alcinnz appear to have repeated (boosted in mastodon speak) it, see https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4096717. I definitely did not. The closest post I repeated was one of your responses https://gnusocial.jp/notice/8020532. Something is wrong with gnusocial here.
I assume the post you are referring to is the original post of this thread by mjg59, because I see on the gnusocial web client that both I and @alcinnz appear to have repeated (boosted in mastodon speak) it, see https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4096717. I definitely did not. The closest post I repeated was one of your responses https://gnusocial.jp/notice/8020532. Something is wrong with gnusocial here.
gnusocial.jpConversation - GNU social JP