re: defining "gimp" 

re: defining "gimp" 

re: defining "gimp" 

re: defining "gimp" 

re: defining "gimp" 

re: defining "gimp" 

re: defining "gimp" 

re: defining "gimp" 

re: defining "gimp" 

re: defining "gimp" 

re: defining "gimp" 

re: defining "gimp" 

re: defining "gimp" 

re: defining "gimp" 

re: defining "gimp" 

FOSS discourse 

re: FOSS discourse 

re: FOSS discourse 

re: FOSS discourse 

re: FOSS discourse 

re: FOSS discourse 

philosophical whatever, FOSS 

re: philosophical whatever, FOSS 

Follow

@xj9 @hirojin @emsenn @pixel @grainloom @rey @ekaitz_zarraga My take is that maintainers *should* listen to their community, but the point of FLOSS is to provide alternative options when they do not. To hold the maintainer more accountable.

But also there's the situations where you can't please everyone, in which case you'll have turn people away from community.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
FLOSS.social

For people who care about, support, or build Free, Libre, and Open Source Software (FLOSS).