@clacke If I made content like a television series and I want you to pay for it because of the production costs that went into it, I can't see an issue with requesting said payment for that. Media and content isn't produced for free. Prohibiting unlicensed sharing of that code isn't immoral. It's like how the GPL prohibits you from changing the terms on the license when you share it with people.
@alcinnz @JordiGH @clacke if they don't pay, will they still be able to access said episode? To be honest, I'd be more in favor of a model that allows one to recoup costs of the episode and then not charge once that number is met. That's allowing people who can afford to pay to make it more accessible to others. I'm also in favor of allowing people to pay within their means (a sliding scale).
@jalcine @JordiGH @clacke Also I think charging for what you have not yet published/finished making is the stronger model, it's difficult to subvert without relying on infringing our software freedom.
But I do like the idea of making the first viewings extra special to recoup costs: that's the basic idea of the cinema.