Quick history lesson that's causing me pain.

RSS was originally meant to showcase RDF, but in that role it utterly fails. Because it turned into a poor expression of both XML & RDF. Later Atom was standardized to be a more XML-onic RSS but by that time the harm was done. Trying to deal with two formats just makes things in the work I'm doing. Because I have to ignore namespaces which XML-tools don't like to do.

So I'll stop trying to use XPath and build simpler primitives for myself instead.

@alcinnz I honestly don't understand why RSS 1.0/2.0 is still around, I guess people just go with them when they need an "RSS feed".
How to make it clear to everyone that the "RSS feed" is not to be done with RSS 1.0 / RSS 2.0, but with the Atom standard?
Follow

@xrevan86 in all my communications on the subject I consistently use the term "webfeed" I hope that's helps.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
FLOSS.social

FLOSS.social was launched on 1 April 2018 as a Mastodon instance for people who care about, support, or build Free, Libre, and Open Source Software (FLOSS). Of course, discussions aren't limited to just FLOSS -- let's share our unique interests! English is preferred for maximum conversation opportunities within the FLOSS community, but it is not required. Respect is required, however: Users on FLOSS.social agree to abide by the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. This service was installed and is maintained in part by Masto.Host with equipment located at OVH. You can support this instance financially through the Monthly Supporter Program, processed through CommitChange using the free software Houdini Project.