- Master #asekai thread -
(FOSS "mon" simulation game)
asekai development news
current version of the game
[further links / info about the game inside thread]
- other important threads -
pinephone testing thread
(m3u playlist "player")
‘saucernexus sandcats io’ server will be down indefinitely / up unpredictably until i have a working laptop
which could be as long as august, sadly.
It's what I expect distributed content-centric Internet-replacement systems like Scuttlebutt will inevitably evolve into. Ie: a big distributed RAM system, which will then need a programming language running on top of it which is suited to that environment.
We will need this kind of distributed user-controlled computing environment if we want to preserve any kind of political, economic and communications democracy in the future.
If we aren't thinking about this now, we will be trapped.
ie we have a stark choice:
1) Do nothing, continue on the computing path we are on now, which is all cloud-centric, dominated by giant companies sensing and filtering all our data and computation. This is taking the world to an extremely dark place.
2) Try to build an alternate, decentralised Internet, in which users retain control of their own data and keep it physically close as much as possible. This gives humanity a slim chance of surviving the coming century.
I have a weird problem with fanfiction where it’s like
if it’s more likely to be fair use / uncensorable to just dump a skeletal outline of ideas for my story in a mastodon thread (especially along with extra commentary about the source series) and people may even be more likely to see it and engage with it in that digestible format
why actually go write the fic.
...although you have to install a special package called blender-2.7-es, or any other version of blender that exists will complain the graphics driver doesn't support the correct opengl.
you can't even compile blender unless you got the source for that specific package
> publishers are artificially deciding [the cost to lend a book]
and these publishers are ostensibly doing this in order to preserve the ability to sell books on a market.
going back to Bad TF Article,
the idea if you want to get a reasonable unit price for your book you go to a market and it pays the market price determined by demand is now wrong
- often market prices are determined by price fixing
- sometimes a market price is $0. in this case you should use something other than a market
I feel like the Internet Archive lawsuit shows us in a way that copyright is not a right or left issue where things can be blamed on 'The Communists'
What these publishers actually attacked was a system to lend the exact number of "books" a particular library had.
publishers are artificially deciding whether a book costs $15 (if you buy 1 book and lend physically + digitally)
or $30 (if you buy 1 book + 1 digital lending license)
or "even $1000 per book cannot buy you a digital lending copy"
this TF writer:
silly copyright advocates, you can't just demand /money/ for something that required work to produce. that's completely ridiculous. you require a /market/ to go to in order to ever earn money on any product
have you ever heard of the services that already exist to fund things by means other than a unit price and a market, such as say..... crowdfunding campaigns??
This thread, including this toot and its surrounding 'background'
- discussions I saw where people /insisted/ shareware is a good idea
- that bizarre article above that accidentally claimed "almost all" forms of property were intangible
- by now, the Internet Archive digital lending lawsuit
came to my mind today when I saw an absolutely godawful torrentfreak article saying copyright is "Communism"
you tried. you really did. you failed but you at least started with a good question
whenever i see somebody who thinks copyright existing is at all a useful tool toward creating a living wage, i'm like
do you ever stop and visualise how much money the people that would pay this possess
have you seen the way all the most successful web businesses,
which /do/ earn a lot from ads,
get millions of customers by charging nothing
what if that was just the amount of money customers had
what if 90% of people who want to access something actually couldn't afford to pay money for it
i like to listen to reviews of disney movies
it's incredibly interesting to hear people apply real art criticism to works that were essentially first made to make money
but at the same time i often find modern animated movie content most enjoyable when the stories have been forcibly reclaimed in 'retelling' by a reviewing community that also offers me perspectives outside my own
i might not consider cars 'good' by itself but i love to listen to analyses of what the hell is going on with it
It seems the publishers are still trying to sue over this limited system but it's unclear where that's going
While not all that active for a while, QuestionCopyright also has a good entry about the National Emergency Library
(If you're wondering what happened with that, it seems publishers 'successfully' ended... one whole more planned month of it before it was going to close anyway. The books are even still available with artificial limits on checkout.)
I love the BookLiberator.
Even if they decided to make basically a "camera scanner" app to replace most of its functionality, it served its purpose of being an absolutely fantastic metaphor for copyright discussions
Everything — but not because people might use it for illegal copying. [...] The reason the BookLiberator fits into our mission is precisely that [...] When people feel, in their daily lives, how much they are restricted by copyright, [...] All the pro-monopoly lobbyists in the world can’t prevail if people know the issues from their own personal experience.
But, knowing that my own modsphere ideas are often either non-derivative works or clones that drop trademarks / features
I think the potential for asekai plugins to start getting people arguing about the merits of user freedom to make fan culture vs #copyright restrictions is more of a good thing
(To be more precise on what they *are*, a modsphere is a bundle of plugins.
the only real difference between a modsphere and separate plugins is that separate plugins are usually used for things like mon strains that could easily be enabled alone,
while some things such as a world map are less likely to be a separate plugin than packaged into a modsphere you could then enable wholly or pick and choose plugins out of.)
- what are "base modules"?
#asekai is intended to be modular,
such there's a bit of core code supporting various API features mons etc will be able to do,
& then all content, including "official" story & its associated "official mon list", is added as plugins — which could simply add data, or actually use existing functionality to program new features.
I basically use the term "base modules" to avoid saying "canon", so it feels more like fan creations are just as valid as 'base module' content
> all content, including "official" story & its associated "official mon list", is added as plugins
The #asekai "base API" will also have a whole concept called "modspheres".
These basically allow you to build another entire game system on top of the base asekai engine.
Similar to an RPG rom patch, or when people extend the D&D rules to add some arbitrary extra thing they want to play
my idea is that you could play base asekai on one savefile and entirely another 'world' on another one
Takumi 🞘 26 🞘 they/them 🞙 j-/prog rock nerd , "All" the sciences , FLOSS/libre media advocate , myth creator
For people who care about, support, or build Free, Libre, and Open Source Software (FLOSS).