floss.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
For people who care about, support, and build Free, Libre, and Open Source Software (FLOSS).

Administered by:

Server stats:

686
active users

I'm not normally on Masto at this time, but just had a question.

In #GIMP3 the Lightness/Contrast tool appears to go *much* darker with one adjustment to contrast, compared to #GIMP 2.

I felt in G2, that the slider made smaller, incremental changes (and is easier for me to replicate than using curves because I don't always have steady hands).

Has anyone else noticed contrast being darker?

Is the only answer to use Curves/Levels?

Thanks,

FJ

@GIMP

GIMP

@FibroJedi Here, i did see a difference, but when i turned off colour management in the view menu, i could no longer see a difference, and i think i had different colour profiles for the monitor. (i love your image in the screenshot!)

You could try expanding the Blending Options in Brightness/Contrast and reducing the opacity to 50% or so, to give you effectively half steps, maybe?

@GIMP I wish I could claim ownership of the image, but it's a screenshot I'm adjusting for a gaming blog.

Different colour profiles, hmm. With colour management turned off I get these images.

I'm going to see if I can reproduce the only-one-contrast on an older version of the GIMP AppImage.

It just feels like G3's contrast has bigger "steps" than G2.

@GIMP Oh I see what's going on.

To get the same level of darkness from "1 Contrast" in Gimp3, I had to set a contrast of 7-8 in Gimp 2.

So, is there something missing in how I've set up #GIMP3 that means it's making larger jumps in G3?

@FibroJedi Not sure. is your image at the same encoding/precision (e.g. RGB 8bits)? Also check with colour management turned off in the view menu to see it's not a profile difference.

@GIMP

1. I used the same image file in both tests, I just used different layers to display the outputs.But yes, it's RGB-8 set in 2.10 and 3.0.

2. Colour managing off made no difference.

I meant to dig into this while it was GIMP 2.99 but I just never got around to it. And I assumed I'd done something wrong, so "User Error" is not a "Bug" (with the software anyway, just...the user).

@FibroJedi it might be a bug, or at least a difference - please do feel free to file an issue; there's a link at the foot of gimp.org to file a bug, and we can look in more detail. Thanks!

In the meantime reducing opacity in Blending Options may be a workaround to explore.

@GIMP Aye, I will use your workaround for now. I'll leave the bug report as the one I did yesterday turned out not to be one because it was mentioned 1-2 years ago and I hadn't searched that far back before filing. I don't want to waste anyone's time.

Hopefully someone else will spot it and I can support it then.

But thank you so much for your time, I appreciate it.

@FibroJedi it’s not a waste of time - it helps us know it affects more people.

I did find this though - gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/

gitlab.gnome.orgMaking sure you're not a bot!

@GIMP Now I need to research colour theory and how GIMP3 interprets light differently. I've tried using levels, but I was so used to how Brightness/Contrast works it was enough.

I've "thumbed-up" that thread. As it's a known issue, is there any point in filing it now?

@FibroJedi i don't know for sure it's the same thing, so if you hav more to add feel free, no point making a new report indeed. Thanks!

@GIMP Yeah, I can try and use the opacity setting, but it takes me ages to change routines (it's a mindset adjustment issue!). I'll try to, though.